-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FreeBSD r256956: Improve ZFS N-way mirror read performance by using l… #4334
Conversation
Performance tests have not been done on this. If the buildbot does not identify any problems, someone should do some benchmarks. |
a6a040c
to
48c4cde
Compare
48c4cde
to
fb1e93e
Compare
I'm all for a better implementation but we'll need to get some performance numbers to verify that. |
@behlendorf I ported this after a user complained that this code is not being shared across platforms. I am leaving benchmarks to others willing to volunteer. I imagine this could be used: https://gist.github.com/brendangregg/7270ff9698c70d9e7496 Whoever does benchmarks will just need to test 1, 2, 3 and 4 drive configurations like you did for the commit message of 556011d. |
@behlendorf @inkdot7 has done tests on this in #4363 (with prefetch enabled). They show improvements that appear to be consistent with the FreeBSD numbers. |
@inkdot7 thank you for running those performance tests and posting the results. To summarize they show a big performance win mixing a HDD and SSD pretty much across the board. For devices of the same type there may be a small improvement of a few percent. @ryao aside for the needed man page updates this looks good to me. If you can get that updated I'll get this merged, I definitely agree we should stay consistent with the improvements FreeBSD made here. |
8e18498
to
1bffa12
Compare
@behlendorf I have modified the commit to amend the man page, rebased on master and repushed. |
…oad and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: openzfs#1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd-src@e186f56 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011d entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org>
1bffa12
to
f19d289
Compare
@ryao awesome, thanks. |
Performance results courtesy of testing done by @inkdot7. Testing Parameters:
Notes:
|
…oad and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: openzfs/zfs#1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: openzfs/zfs#4334 (comment) Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd-src@e186f56 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011d entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Changed kstat types, and added kstat defines for OSX. Ported-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
…oad and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: openzfs/zfs#1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: openzfs/zfs#4334 (comment) Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd-src@e186f56 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011d entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Changed kstat types, and added kstat defines for OSX. Ported-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
Nice work! |
@jumbi77 It is possible, although that will likely wait until someone sits down to port patches from ZoL to illumos unless @mmatuska ports it from FreeBSD first. I don't think Illumos' block layer had the hooks to indicate when a drive is solid state when this was originally written for FreeBSD, but it does now. |
…oad and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: openzfs/zfs#1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: openzfs/zfs#4334 (comment) Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd-src@e186f56 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011d entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Changed kstat types, and added kstat defines for OSX. Ported-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
…oad and locality information. The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs being under utilized. The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors: * Load of the vdevs (number outstanding I/O requests) * The locality of last queued I/O vs the new I/O request. Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device. This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't have evenly performing devices. The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and 1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's. With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0): == Stripe Balanced (default) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s == Load Balanced (zfslinux) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s == Load Balanced (locality freebsd) == Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates. The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm: * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.rotating_seek_offset * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_inc * vfs.zfs.vdev.mirror.non_rotating_seek_inc These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers: openzfs/zfs#1487 Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Multiplay References: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@5c7a6f5d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@31b7f68d https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd@e186f564 Performance Testing: openzfs/zfs#4334 (comment) Porting notes: - The tunables were adjusted to have ZoL-style names. - The code was modified to use ZoL's vd_nonrot. - Fixes were done to make cstyle.pl happy - Merge conflicts were handled manually - freebsd/freebsd-src@e186f56 by my collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but added a cstyle regression. - This replaces 556011d entirely. - A typo "IO'a" has been corrected to say "IO's" - Descriptions of new tunables were added to man/man5/zfs-module-parameters.5. Ported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Changed kstat types, and added kstat defines for OSX. Ported-by: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
|
||
/* | ||
* We don't return INT_MAX if the device is resilvering i.e. | ||
* vdev_resilver_txg != 0 as when tested performance was slightly |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This comment seemed obsolete. I don't see this function uses vdev_resilver_txg anywhere. Maybe I missed something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My reading of the comment is that it explains why there isn't additional code here which adds additional weight to devices which are currently resilvering. As the comment says it wasn't worthwhile.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@behlendorf I see - thanks!
Will this be merged? Looks straightforward to me, and it has tests. |
Wasn't it merged here: 9f50093 |
…oad and locality information.
The existing algorithm selects a preferred leaf vdev based on offset of the zio
request modulo the number of members in the mirror. It assumes the devices are
of equal performance and that spreading the requests randomly over both drives
will be sufficient to saturate them. In practice this results in the leaf vdevs
being under utilized.
The new algorithm takes into the following additional factors:
Within the locality calculation additional knowledge about the underlying vdev
is considered such as; is the device backing the vdev a rotating media device.
This results in performance increases across the board as well as significant
increases for predominantly streaming loads and for configurations which don't
have evenly performing devices.
The following are results from a setup with 3 Way Mirror with 2 x HD's and
1 x SSD from a basic test running multiple parrallel dd's.
With pre-fetch disabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1):
== Stripe Balanced (default) ==
Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 161 seconds @ 95 MB/s
== Load Balanced (zfslinux) ==
Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 297 seconds @ 51 MB/s
== Load Balanced (locality freebsd) ==
Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 54 seconds @ 284 MB/s
With pre-fetch enabled (vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0):
== Stripe Balanced (default) ==
Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 91 seconds @ 168 MB/s
== Load Balanced (zfslinux) ==
Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 108 seconds @ 142 MB/s
== Load Balanced (locality freebsd) ==
Read 15360MB using bs: 1048576, readers: 3, took 48 seconds @ 320 MB/s
In addition to the performance changes the code was also restructured, with
the help of Justin Gibbs, to provide a more logical flow which also ensures
vdevs loads are only calculated from the set of valid candidates.
The following additional sysctls where added to allow the administrator
to tune the behaviour of the load algorithm:
These changes where based on work started by the zfsonlinux developers:
#1487
Reviewed by: gibbs, mav, will
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: Multiplay
Porting notes:
collegue Andriy Gapon has been included. It applied perfectly, but
added a cstyle regression.
has been added.
Ported-by: Richard Yao ryao@gentoo.org