Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 25, 2020. It is now read-only.

Consider lighter weight Docker image variant #41

Open
shakuzen opened this issue May 27, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Consider lighter weight Docker image variant #41

shakuzen opened this issue May 27, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@shakuzen
Copy link

Pulling the Docker image initially (and upon certain updates to the tag) requires downloading quite large layers (hundreds of megabytes). Have we considered using the Alpine Linux variant for the base image to reduce the size of layers? How difficult would it be to switch to that, and what tradeoffs would it involve?

/cc @abesto

@abesto
Copy link
Contributor

abesto commented May 28, 2019

Confession time: I put together the Docker image in the fastest way I possibly could. You're absolutely right it should be sitting on Alpine and be as small as possible (at which point also the wrapper script should pull before each run). I don't foresee any particular roadblocks with this (source: "Famous Last Words")

@shakuzen
Copy link
Author

shakuzen commented Jun 4, 2019

Confession time: I put together the Docker image in the fastest way I possibly could.

Fair enough, and good approach, I think. I know Adrian and I at least sometimes are running on not the fastest public internet, so the big pulls can be painfully slow. If I find time, I will try to convert things to Alpine, or some other more lightweight variant. I'm not sure when I will likely have time to do this, though, so if anyone else has time and interest, feel free to work on it.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants