Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Westworld v0.2.2 #24

Closed
michaelquigley opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Westworld v0.2.2 #24

michaelquigley opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@michaelquigley
Copy link
Collaborator

Develop a parallel implementation of westwood supporting the lockless model.

@michaelquigley michaelquigley created this issue from a note in dilithium Planning (Current Context) May 27, 2020
@michaelquigley michaelquigley added this to the v0.2 milestone May 27, 2020
@michaelquigley michaelquigley self-assigned this May 27, 2020
@michaelquigley
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Could we/should we revisit flatbuffers just for header information? Our framing format can deal with the data segment directly.

michaelquigley added a commit that referenced this issue May 29, 2020
michaelquigley added a commit that referenced this issue May 29, 2020
michaelquigley added a commit that referenced this issue May 29, 2020
michaelquigley added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2020
michaelquigley added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2020
michaelquigley added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2020
michaelquigley added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2020
michaelquigley added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2020
michaelquigley added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2020
…rld2' (for comparison). Wire in 'quic' (from quic-go) for comparison. (#24)
michaelquigley added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2020
michaelquigley added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2020
@michaelquigley michaelquigley moved this from Current Context to Evaluation in dilithium Planning Jun 9, 2020
@michaelquigley michaelquigley removed this from Evaluation in dilithium Planning Jul 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant