Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add current profile annotations to CVO manifests #73

Closed

Conversation

guillaumerose
Copy link

@guillaumerose guillaumerose commented Nov 2, 2020

This is matches openshift/enhancements#510 and doesn't change existing behavior

@guillaumerose
Copy link
Author

/hold

I thought it would be better for operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager#1832 but I can do it without this PR.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 2, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 15, 2020
@guillaumerose
Copy link
Author

not required finally.

@guillaumerose guillaumerose reopened this Dec 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 3, 2020
@guillaumerose
Copy link
Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 3, 2020
This is matches openshift/enhancements#510 and doesn't change existing behavior
@estroz
Copy link
Member

estroz commented Dec 8, 2020

This isn't the right place to be adding non-operator-framework annotations.

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 8, 2020
@estroz
Copy link
Member

estroz commented Dec 8, 2020

Actually this should probably be closed. I suggest making this PR to the downstream OLM repo (when it exists).

@estroz estroz closed this Dec 8, 2020
@guillaumerose
Copy link
Author

Yes, can you PTAL at operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager#1897 ? Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants