Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: explicit workflow invocation #2289

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024
Merged

feat: explicit workflow invocation #2289

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

csviri
Copy link
Collaborator

@csviri csviri commented Mar 13, 2024

No description provided.

@csviri csviri marked this pull request as draft March 13, 2024 16:51
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 13, 2024
@csviri csviri linked an issue Mar 13, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@csviri csviri marked this pull request as ready for review March 15, 2024 10:41
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 15, 2024
@csviri csviri requested a review from metacosm March 15, 2024 10:41
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
@csviri csviri force-pushed the custom-invocation-workflow branch from 6433325 to 883c3ad Compare March 15, 2024 13:10
Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <claprun@redhat.com>

// additional logic before the workflow is executed

context.managedWorkflowAndDependentResourceContext().reconcileManagedWorkflow();
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@metacosm why did you delete sample code from here?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because it doesn't add much, imo, and would need to be kept up to date (as are the other samples)…

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will merge this now as it is, when we migrate to docsy, would be nice to revisit the principles for the dox though

Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
@csviri csviri merged commit 986d20a into next Mar 18, 2024
20 checks passed
@csviri csviri deleted the custom-invocation-workflow branch March 18, 2024 13:02
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024

Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
metacosm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024

Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
metacosm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2024

Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2024

Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2024
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2024
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <csviri@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Custom Invocation of Managed Workflows
2 participants