Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[release-4.3] Bug 1796913: packageserver update fails to adopt APIService #1270

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 20, 2020
Merged

[release-4.3] Bug 1796913: packageserver update fails to adopt APIService #1270

merged 1 commit into from Feb 20, 2020

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1171

/assign exdx

@exdx
Addresses the bug where updating the packageserver fails with a unabl…
ee0557e 
…e to adopt APIService status message. This is a result of ownership mismatches between the packageserver (owner) and the APIService (the owned object). This can be resolved by setting the actual k8s owner references or the label-based references that OLM uses. This commit ensures that ownership references for the APIService are cleaned up on OLM restart and that the olm.owner:packageserver label is set on the corresponding APIService object.
@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2020
Merged
5 tasks
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1777144, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.3.z" release, but it targets "4.4.0" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 1777144 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.3] Bug 1777144: packageserver update fails to adopt APIService

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jan 31, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 31, 2020
@exdx exdx changed the title [release-4.3] Bug 1777144: packageserver update fails to adopt APIService [release-4.3] Bug 1796913: packageserver update fails to adopt APIService Jan 31, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1796913, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1777144 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.3] Bug 1796913: packageserver update fails to adopt APIService

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@exdx
Copy link
Member

exdx commented Jan 31, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@exdx: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1796913, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1777144 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ecordell
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 31, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ecordell, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 31, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

12 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

10 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@exdx
Copy link
Member

exdx commented Feb 1, 2020

/hold due to verify issue around license year

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 1, 2020
@exdx
Copy link
Member

exdx commented Feb 4, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@exdx: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1796913, which is valid.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 4, 2020
@exdx
Copy link
Member

exdx commented Feb 5, 2020

/retest
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 5, 2020
@exdx
Copy link
Member

exdx commented Feb 5, 2020

/test verify

@bparees bparees added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Feb 19, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit be03edc into operator-framework:release-4.3 Feb 20, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1796913 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.3] Bug 1796913: packageserver update fails to adopt APIService

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jpeeler jpeeler Awaiting requested review from jpeeler

@njhale njhale Awaiting requested review from njhale

Assignees

@ecordell ecordell

@exdx exdx

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
7 participants
@openshift-cherrypick-robot @openshift-ci-robot @exdx @ecordell @openshift-bot @bparees @openshift-merge-robot