New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.4] Bug 1808418: Don't block on ctx.Done() if startup fails. #1336
[release-4.4] Bug 1808418: Don't block on ctx.Done() if startup fails. #1336
Conversation
Operator startup errors aren't recoverable without restarting the process, so it's critical that the operator process is allowed to terminate in these cases.
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1807128, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1808418, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@benluddy: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1808418, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@benluddy: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.3 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test unit |
1 similar comment
/test unit |
/test unit @ecordell Is this one of the OG unit flakes you have been looking at? |
/test unit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/retest |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ecordell, openshift-cherrypick-robot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered searching for bug 1808418 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@benluddy: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1808418 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.3 |
@ecordell: new pull request created: #1366 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #1323
/assign benluddy