Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1885398: Retrieve CA from conversion webhooks for CA Hash #1797

Conversation

awgreene
Copy link
Member

@awgreene awgreene commented Oct 6, 2020

Problem: If a CSV defines a Conversion Webhook but does not include an
API Service or an Admission Webhook the CSV will cycle through the
Pending, ReadyToInstall, and Installing phases indefinitely.

Cause: When deploying an operator with an API Service, Conversion
Webhook, or an Admission Webhook, OLM should retrieve the CA from an
existing resource in order to calculate a CA Hash annotation. This
annotation influences a Deployment Hash that OLM relies on to confirm
that the deployment is installed correctly. OLM currently does not
retrieve the CA from Conversion Webhooks, resulting in a bad
Deployment Hash which causes OLM to attempt to reinstall the CSV.

Solution: Update OLM so it will use the existing Conversion Webhook to
retrieve that value of the CA and correctly calculate the Deployment
Hash.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: awgreene

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 6, 2020
@awgreene awgreene changed the title Retrieve CA from conversion webhooks for CA Hash Bug 1885398: Retrieve CA from conversion webhooks for CA Hash Oct 6, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 6, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@awgreene: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1885398, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1885398: Retrieve CA from conversion webhooks for CA Hash

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 6, 2020
@awgreene awgreene force-pushed the retrieve-ca-from-cw branch 2 times, most recently from acceab0 to 223fe0d Compare October 7, 2020 19:33
Problem: If a CSV defines a Conversion Webhook but does not include an
API Service or an Admission Webhook the CSV will cycle through the
Pending, ReadyToInstall, and Installing phases indefinitely.

Cause: When deploying an operator with an API Service, Conversion
Webhook, or an Admission Webhook, OLM should retrieve the CA from an
existing resource in order to calculate a CA Hash annotation. This
annotation influences a Deployment Hash that OLM relies on to confirm
that the deployment is installed correctly. OLM currently does not
retrieve the CA from Conversion Webhooks, resulting in a bad
Deployment Hash which causes OLM to attempt to reinstall the CSV.

Solution: Update OLM so it will use the existing Conversion Webhook to
retrieve that value of the CA and correctly calculate the Deployment
Hash.
@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 7, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

12 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 7e476bb into operator-framework:master Oct 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@awgreene: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1885398 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1885398: Retrieve CA from conversion webhooks for CA Hash

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@awgreene
Copy link
Member Author

awgreene commented Oct 8, 2020

/cherry-pick release-4.6

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@awgreene: new pull request created: #1802

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants