Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-17157: controller/registry: don't set memory limits for target #3015

Conversation

stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Member

It's not allowed for core components to have memory limits, to ensure that that source of crash-looping pods does not occur to the core payload.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 18, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@stevekuznetsov: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17791, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.14.0" version, but it targets "4.13.z" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

It's not allowed for core components to have memory limits, to ensure that that source of crash-looping pods does not occur to the core payload.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

It's not allowed for core components to have memory limits, to ensure
that that source of crash-looping pods does not occur to the core
payload.

Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
@awgreene
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 21, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 21, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: awgreene, stevekuznetsov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 21, 2023
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Aug 21, 2023

Need to update the bug to include 4.14.0 to fix the jira label.

@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov changed the title OCPBUGS-17791: controller/registry: don't set memory limits for target OCPBUGS-17157: controller/registry: don't set memory limits for target Aug 21, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 21, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@stevekuznetsov: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17157, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jianzhangbjz

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

It's not allowed for core components to have memory limits, to ensure that that source of crash-looping pods does not occur to the core payload.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Member Author

Had it on the wrong bug, oops

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ff0baf4 into operator-framework:master Aug 21, 2023
16 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@stevekuznetsov: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17157: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-17157 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

It's not allowed for core components to have memory limits, to ensure that that source of crash-looping pods does not occur to the core payload.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants