Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug 1819953: [release-4.4] [deprecation] Prometheus alert for custom resources #299

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 15, 2020
Merged

Bug 1819953: [release-4.4] [deprecation] Prometheus alert for custom resources #299

merged 1 commit into from Apr 15, 2020

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

This is an automated cherry-pick of #298

/assign anik120

@anik120
Prometheus alert for custom resources
fbd1ccd 
This PR introduces a Promethues alert to accompany the log and
the CVO status update in presence of a custom OperatorSource
or any CatalogSourceConfig.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.4] [deprecation] Prometheus alert for custom resources

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Apr 8, 2020
Merged
5 tasks
@anik120 anik120 changed the title [release-4.4] [deprecation] Prometheus alert for custom resources Bug 1819953 : [release-4.4] [deprecation] Prometheus alert for custom resources Apr 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 1819953 : [release-4.4] [deprecation] Prometheus alert for custom resources

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor

anik120 commented Apr 8, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@anik120: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@anik120 anik120 changed the title Bug 1819953 : [release-4.4] [deprecation] Prometheus alert for custom resources Bug 1819953: [release-4.4] [deprecation] Prometheus alert for custom resources Apr 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1819953, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1819953 to depend on a bug targeting the "4.5.0" release and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1819953: [release-4.4] [deprecation] Prometheus alert for custom resources

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor

anik120 commented Apr 8, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@anik120: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1819953, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1819953 to depend on a bug targeting the "4.5.0" release and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor

anik120 commented Apr 8, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@anik120: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1819953, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1819953 to depend on a bug targeting the "4.5.0" release and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor

anik120 commented Apr 8, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@anik120: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1819953, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.4.z" instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 1819953 to depend on a bug targeting the "4.5.0" release and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ecordell
Copy link
Member

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ecordell: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1819953, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.4.z" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1823204 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor

anik120 commented Apr 14, 2020

/bugzilla refresh
/test e2e-aws

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@anik120: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1819953, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1823204 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh
/test e2e-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ecordell
Copy link
Member

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 15, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ecordell: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1819953, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.4.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1823204 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1823204 targets the "4.5.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.5.0, 4.5.z
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 15, 2020
@ecordell
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 15, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ecordell, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 15, 2020
@ecordell ecordell added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Apr 15, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@shawn-hurley
Copy link
Member

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 985aa35 into operator-framework:release-4.4 Apr 15, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: operator-framework/operator-marketplace#299. Bugzilla bug 1819953 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1819953: [release-4.4] [deprecation] Prometheus alert for custom resources

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@aravindhp aravindhp Awaiting requested review from aravindhp

@tkashem tkashem Awaiting requested review from tkashem

Assignees

@ecordell ecordell

@anik120 anik120

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
7 participants
@openshift-cherrypick-robot @openshift-ci-robot @anik120 @ecordell @openshift-bot @shawn-hurley @openshift-merge-robot