Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1835884: opm bundle extract shouldn't validate annotations #338

Merged

Conversation

kevinrizza
Copy link
Member

Currently, the configmap writer attempts to validate the annotations
associated with the bundle. In reality, most of these annotations are
currently unused by the time the bundle is being unpacked and applied
to the cluster. There was an issue where default channel was no longer
required, but it was still validated by extract because it has a
separate validation function.

These annotations should be validated when building and
adding to the registry (as it exists now). This pr removes
annotation validation from the configmap writer in opm alpha bundle
extract.

Currently, the configmap writer attempts to validate the annotations
associated with the bundle. In reality, most of these annotations are
currently unused by the time the bundle is being unpacked and applied
to the cluster. There was an issue where default channel was no longer
required, but it was still validated by extract because it has a
separate validation function.

These annotations should be validated when building and
adding to the registry (as it exists now). This commit removes
annotation validation from the configmap writer in opm alpha bundle
extract
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@kevinrizza: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1834884, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.0" release, but it targets "---" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (RAWHIDE) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1834884: opm bundle extract shouldn't validate annotations

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kevinrizza

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 27, 2020
@kevinrizza kevinrizza changed the title Bug 1834884: opm bundle extract shouldn't validate annotations Bug 1835884: opm bundle extract shouldn't validate annotations May 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. labels May 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@kevinrizza: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1835884, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1835884: opm bundle extract shouldn't validate annotations

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 27, 2020
@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@kevinrizza: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1835884, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Bowenislandsong
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/hold for second review

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 27, 2020
@exdx
Copy link
Member

exdx commented May 27, 2020

/lgtm

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 27, 2020
source: "testdata/bundle-with-no-default-channel.yaml",
assertFunc: func(t *testing.T, bundleGot *api.Bundle) {
csvGot := bundleGot.GetCsvJson()
assert.NotNil(t, csvGot)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Pointless assertion, csvGot is a string. Actually, two tests above this one asserts nothing but this.

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-aws

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 818824c into operator-framework:master May 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@kevinrizza: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: operator-framework/operator-registry#338. Bugzilla bug 1835884 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1835884: opm bundle extract shouldn't validate annotations

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants