Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1921727: Bundle validate should not fail because of warnings. #4449

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 29, 2021

Conversation

jmrodri
Copy link
Member

@jmrodri jmrodri commented Jan 28, 2021

Description of the change:
Bumped to operator-framework/api.

Motivation for the change:
Bundle validate with optional validators would fail if there was a warning during the validation instead of passing but listing out the warning.

$ build/operator-sdk bundle validate --select-optional name=operatorhub registry-proxy.engineering.redhat.com/rh-osbs/openshift-ose-clusterresourceoverride-operator-bundle:v4.6.0.202101230113.p0-1
...
ERRO[0001] Error: Value : (clusterresourceoverride-operator.4.6.0-202101230113.p0) Warning: Value : csv.Spec.Icon not specified 

Checklist

If the pull request includes user-facing changes, extra documentation is required:

@jmrodri
Copy link
Member Author

jmrodri commented Jan 28, 2021

/hold needs changelog

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 28, 2021
@jmrodri
Copy link
Member Author

jmrodri commented Jan 28, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 28, 2021
@jmrodri jmrodri requested review from estroz and varshaprasad96 and removed request for fabianvf January 28, 2021 21:38
Copy link
Member

@gallettilance gallettilance left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 28, 2021
Copy link
Member

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Bumped to operator-framework/api.

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 29, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 29, 2021
@jmrodri jmrodri merged commit 36f1fe5 into operator-framework:master Jan 29, 2021
estroz pushed a commit to estroz/operator-sdk that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2021
…erator-framework#4449)

Bumped to operator-framework/api.

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>
estroz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2021
…ings. (#4449) (#4458)

Bumped to operator-framework/api.

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>

Co-authored-by: Jesus Rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>
reinvantveer pushed a commit to reinvantveer/operator-sdk that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2021
…erator-framework#4449)

Bumped to operator-framework/api.

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rein van 't Veer <reinvantveer@gmail.com>
reinvantveer pushed a commit to reinvantveer/operator-sdk that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2021
…erator-framework#4449)

Bumped to operator-framework/api.

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rein van 't Veer <reinvantveer@gmail.com>
reinvantveer pushed a commit to reinvantveer/operator-sdk that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2021
…erator-framework#4449)

Bumped to operator-framework/api.

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rein van 't Veer <reinvantveer@gmail.com>
reinvantveer pushed a commit to reinvantveer/operator-sdk that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2021
…erator-framework#4449)

Bumped to operator-framework/api.

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: reinvantveer <rein.van.t.veer@geodan.nl>
reinvantveer pushed a commit to reinvantveer/operator-sdk that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2021
…erator-framework#4449)

Bumped to operator-framework/api.

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rein van 't Veer <reinvantveer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: reinvantveer <rein.van.t.veer@geodan.nl>
rearl-scwx pushed a commit to rearl-scwx/operator-sdk that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2021
…erator-framework#4449)

Bumped to operator-framework/api.

Signed-off-by: jesus m. rodriguez <jesusr@redhat.com>Signed-off-by: rearl <rearl@secureworks.com>
@jmrodri jmrodri deleted the bug1921727 branch January 30, 2022 18:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants