README feedback

[adrinjalali]

All the changes are suggestions, I've done them here for us to discuss. Let me know what you think.

I also trimmed the lines to be max 79 chars. Makes it easier to review PRs and edit.

• added misogyny explicitly in the subtitle to be clear about what this is about

questions:

• do we want to have the reporting available from the ad-on? would make it much easier for people to do so.
• the the browser extension section, the local instance of the model is mentioned in the context of consent vs censorship. But I believe the local instance has more to do with the privacy rather than customization. You can still give the individual a personalized experience w/o having the model on their machine.
• I just realized this whole project doesn't have to focus so much on female-identifying people as users. A cic-male straight white guy could also enjoy a cleaner web. If we accept that, not all, but many of the female-identifying terms become user.
• Antidote to silicon valley KPI probably needs a bit of explanation?
• The research section seems to be mixed with motivation in a way. Doesn't it?
• "our browser extension is effective from the word go": I don't understand the sentence.
• the part where it talks about creating two new datasets, the first one is not clear how it's tagged.
• is the tech stack really tensorflow now?

[malteserteresa]

We are building misogyny removing tools, to help female-identifying people engage with healthy online discussion.