Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 3, 2023. It is now read-only.
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 3, 2023. It is now read-only.

Find a better way to handle literal records #6

Open
tmonte opened this issue Nov 16, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Find a better way to handle literal records #6

tmonte opened this issue Nov 16, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@tmonte
Copy link
Collaborator

tmonte commented Nov 16, 2019

The current implementation traverses to all the members and children of the literal record declaration, adding the final declaration to the possible type arguments. The final declaration is not a type node that can give us a type back.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant