lttng-tools-2.13.9-slibtool.patch

https://github.com/lttng/lttng-tools/pull/169
https://github.com/lttng/lttng-tools/commit/bb1c9fc3f89c2faffb0228c0b77e32653e018a23

From bb1c9fc3f89c2faffb0228c0b77e32653e018a23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: orbea <orbea@riseup.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 08:17:37 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix: baddr-statedump: use $(LIBTOOL) --mode=execute
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

GNU libtool inconsistently places the compiled executable in the source
directory or in the .libs directory where a libtool wrapper script is
placed in the source directory.

While slibtool will always place the compiled executable in the .libs
directory and a wrapper script in the source directory.

This will result with a build error when using slibtool since objcopy
needs the executable and not the shell wrapper script, but this can be
solved for both implementations by using $(LIBTOOL) --mode=execute on all
commands that operate on the libtool compiled executables.

Gentoo issue: https://bugs.gentoo.org/858095

The GNU libtool --mode=excute is documented upstream.

https://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Execute-mode.html
https://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Debugging-executables.html

And the GNU libtool behavior of when to create a wrapper script is
documented in the 'Linking Executables' section.

  "Notice that the executable, hell, was actually created in the .libs
  subdirectory. Then, a wrapper script (or, on certain platforms, a
  wrapper executable see Wrapper executables) was created in the current
  directory.

  Since libtool created a wrapper script, you should use libtool to
  install it and debug it too. However, since the program does not depend
  on any uninstalled libtool library, it is probably usable even without
  the wrapper script."

https://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Linking-executables.html

And the inconsistency between GNU libtool and slibtool is documented at
the Gentoo wiki.

  "One difference between GNU libtool and slibtool is that the former will
  conditionally place the compiled executable or a shell wrapper script in
  the build directory, depending on whether or not the executable depends
  on a build-local libtool library (e.g. libfoo.la). Where slibtool will
  always place a compatible wrapper script in the build directory where
  GNU libtool would have conditionally placed the executable. When the
  wrapper script is created both GNU libtool and slibtool will place the
  executable in the .libs directory within the build directory.
  Consequently build systems, ebuilds, and other users should take care to
  avoid scenarios like installing the wrapper script to the system instead
  of the executable. In these cases ideally the executable would be
  installed by the same libtool implementation that compiled it."

https: //wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Slibtool#Installing_or_using_binaries_created_by_libtool_manually
Signed-off-by: orbea <orbea@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Jérémie Galarneau <jeremie.galarneau@efficios.com>
Change-Id: I03102ed78af835daa9b9a5836c2979a5f5d4bd8c
---
 tests/regression/ust/baddr-statedump/Makefile.am | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/regression/ust/baddr-statedump/Makefile.am b/tests/regression/ust/baddr-statedump/Makefile.am
index f8fe26395..d37dbb6dd 100644
--- a/tests/regression/ust/baddr-statedump/Makefile.am
+++ b/tests/regression/ust/baddr-statedump/Makefile.am
@@ -19,11 +19,11 @@ EXTRA_DIST = test_baddr-statedump test_baddr-statedump.py
 
 # Extract debug symbols
 prog.debug: prog
-	$(objcopy_verbose)$(OBJCOPY) --only-keep-debug prog prog.debug
+	$(objcopy_verbose)$(LIBTOOL) --mode=execute $(OBJCOPY) --only-keep-debug prog prog.debug
 
 # Strip and add debuglink
 prog.strip: prog.debug
-	@cp -f prog prog.strip
+	@$(LIBTOOL) --mode=execute cp -f prog prog.strip
 	$(objcopy_verbose)$(OBJCOPY) --strip-debug --add-gnu-debuglink=prog.debug prog.strip
 
 all-local: prog.strip