You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When we introduced fr:dropdown-select1, the XForms engine did not have native support for matching on appearance or other attributes. Since #1936 this is supported, and since #2241 bindings in the XForms namespace are supported. So we should be able to directly use xf:select1[@appearance = 'minimal'] in the form source.
Similarly, xf:output[@mediatype = 'image/*'] maps to fr:image.
Tasks:
implement migration back to xf:select1[@appearance = 'minimal'] in annotate.xpl
check that Form Builder behaves properly (toolbox, FB dialogs, appearance selector)
consider whether using xf:output[@mediatype = 'image/*'] would be better than keeping fr:image
implement migration back to xf:output[@mediatype = 'image/*'] in annotate.xpl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When we introduced
fr:dropdown-select1
, the XForms engine did not have native support for matching onappearance
or other attributes. Since #1936 this is supported, and since #2241 bindings in the XForms namespace are supported. So we should be able to directly usexf:select1[@appearance = 'minimal']
in the form source.Similarly,
xf:output[@mediatype = 'image/*']
maps tofr:image
.Tasks:
xf:select1[@appearance = 'minimal']
inannotate.xpl
xf:output[@mediatype = 'image/*']
would be better than keepingfr:image
xf:output[@mediatype = 'image/*']
inannotate.xpl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: