Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Batch annotation #23

Open
scottveirs opened this issue Sep 18, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Batch annotation #23

scottveirs opened this issue Sep 18, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@scottveirs
Copy link
Member

On some days there are many candidates containing only false positives (e.g. 20-40 candidates containing only Pigeon Guillemot bird calls). In such cases -- when the moderator is confident that no SRKW were present at the time and location of the false positives -- it would be able to "Select all" within a page view or a time interval, and then annotate that temporal batch of candidates with the same labels and comment.

To ensure high-quality annotation of acoustic bouts containing SRKW, each candidate in a bout should be processed separately, rather than in a batch. This would increase odds that every true positive is confirmed, false negatives are flagged, and that call types and "special" signals like whistles or buzzes will be annotated accurately.

@scottveirs scottveirs added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant