Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Complete NGSI-LD backward and forward support #398

Open
1 of 5 tasks
chicco785 opened this issue Nov 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Open
1 of 5 tasks

Complete NGSI-LD backward and forward support #398

chicco785 opened this issue Nov 18, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@chicco785
Copy link
Contributor

chicco785 commented Nov 18, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
PR #373 allows not to inject NGSI-LD using the existing NGSIv2 endpoint.

Still the following limitations apply:

Describe the solution you'd like

  • temporal attributes should be supported
  • context should be stored
  • a specific endpoint for NGSI-LD should be created, including support for NGSI-LD temporal queries, despite some of the semantic there seems odd to us (e.g. only number values are tracked in timeseries, thus changes on other attributes over time are not captured)
@c0c0n3
Copy link
Member

c0c0n3 commented Nov 19, 2020

Notes

  • This issue supplants Support NGSI-LD #154. Close that issue too when merging the PR implementing the current issue.
  • For additional context look at the discussion about NGSI-LD on redis cache on insert #373, e.g. this thread.
  • NGSI-LD does not really support a temporal model w/r/t entity graphs, so to claim QL implements the NGSI-LD entity graph model is enough to store entities the way we do at the moment---notice PR redis cache on insert #373 added the Relationship type. See this comment for more details about it.

@c0c0n3
Copy link
Member

c0c0n3 commented Jan 28, 2021

Also, we've got to add modifiedAt and observedAt to the list of attrs we use to compute the time index, see #433.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issue message

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants