Support to group endpoints into services #121
Replies: 11 comments 15 replies
-
Makes a lot of sense, yes! How do you envision this working? Say you add 3 sites to a "group", we will not only tell you the response time etc. of each site, but also a group average? And perhaps a collapsable in the README? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The most simple approach (that would work for us) is to implement them just as containers: i.e. only some way of grouping endpoints together, with a small description linked with an overall status: OK or DEGRADED. The endpoints will still have their own metrics, and the group can be collapsed or not. For instance, this is how it looks in our current status page (that we are migrating tp upptime): https://status.ifca.es/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Add that pls |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
One alternative way I thought this could be set up would be to have a keyword in the yaml configuration file, such as: sites:
- name: example.com
url: example.com
- hr
- name: example.com
url: example.com which could add a simple horizontal rule to the status website between monitors. Let me know your thoughts. PS Thank you for this great tool! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It would be also great to have an option to collapse a group by default - this is useful to hide endpoints which are not interesting for most of the users. We currently use this with Cachet (https://status.weblate.org/). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Was this somehow implemented? Don't want to create a duplicate discussion thread. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just found this thread after making my own Facepalm is their an update for this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This sounds like a great feature to have. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
this is good if it can be made by group or category. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I prefer the maintainer's approach:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For complex setups, it would be desirable to have a way to group different endpoints into higher level services).
For instance, one could have a group "Webservers" with several endpoints, and another group "Database" with other endpoints, and so on and so forth. It should also be possible to generate downtimes, issues and interventions also to these services.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions