Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Define a method to call against the POJO after unmarshalling [moved] #56

Closed
lvca opened this issue Dec 10, 2012 · 0 comments
Closed

Define a method to call against the POJO after unmarshalling [moved] #56

lvca opened this issue Dec 10, 2012 · 0 comments

Comments

@lvca
Copy link
Member

lvca commented Dec 10, 2012

This is Issue 56 moved from a Google Code project.
Added by 2010-07-09T15:54:27.000Z by l.garu...@gmail.com.
Please review that bug for more context and additional comments, but update this bug.
Closed (Fixed).

Original labels: Type-Enhancement, Priority-Low, v0.9.20

Original description

Useful to control non-persistent fields.

The implementation could read the standard @PostConstruct annotation and invoke that method.
@lvca lvca closed this as completed Dec 10, 2012
@lvca lvca mentioned this issue Jul 30, 2014
Closed
@andyflatt andyflatt mentioned this issue May 1, 2015
Closed
@henryzhao81 henryzhao81 mentioned this issue May 15, 2015
Closed
@martingg88 martingg88 mentioned this issue May 18, 2015
Closed
@martingg88 martingg88 mentioned this issue Jun 8, 2015
Closed
@martingg88 martingg88 mentioned this issue Sep 12, 2015
Closed
lvca added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2015
@lvca
Merge pull request #56 from profeg/53-NullValues
100d2a1 
53 null values
@martingg88 martingg88 mentioned this issue Feb 3, 2016
Closed
@CyprienGottstein CyprienGottstein mentioned this issue May 29, 2018
Closed
tglman pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2024
fixed some issues #56, #55, #46, #39, #12
32e5366
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lvca