Add multi-machine setup script

[okurz]

Also see:

• Provide a script to bootstrap mm devices scripts#190

Related progress issue: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/133025

[okurz]

Added commit "Include os-autoinst-setup-multi-machine in doc+package"

[okurz]

I don't understand

[  133s] found conflict of os-autoinst-4.6.1690870233.228c7a0-lp155.1624.1.x86_64 with os-autoinst-openvswitch-4.6.1690870233.228c7a0-lp155.1624.1.x86_64:
[  133s]   - /usr/bin/os-autoinst-setup-multi-machine

anyone has an idea?

[Martchus]

Maybe that new script gets pulled into the main package as well via that macro: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Conventions_RPM_Macros#%perl_gen_filelist

I found the use of this macro very confusing/unintuitive. So if it goes in the way I suggest to simply remove the use of %perl_gen_filelist and list those files explicitly.

[okurz]

Maybe that new script gets pulled into the main package as well via that macro: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Conventions_RPM_Macros#%perl_gen_filelist

I found the use of this macro very confusing/unintuitive. So if it goes in the way I suggest to simply remove the use of %perl_gen_filelist and list those files explicitly.

Ok, for now I just removed the explicit mention of the file

[Martchus]

But then it will end up in the wrong package.

[okurz]

But then it will end up in the wrong package.

Well, I wouldn't care. It's just a simple shell script :)

EDIT: A better explanation is: os-autoinst-setup-multi-machine can actually handle to install os-autoinst-openvswitch if it is not installed yet and also the setup script does not have additional dependencies so the script should be in the main package

[okurz]

Observed jobs on w23 still not working as in https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3473166#step/firewalld_policy_objects/138 when tap devices were still not in the right zone.

Added two commits

• os-autoinst-setup-multi-machine: Use more common 'br0' as ethernet
• os-autoinst-setup-multi-machine: Ensure devices are created in correct zone

[kalikiana]

What is this TODO telling me? Do we need to add things here? Are we expecting users to edit the script before using it? If so, make it fail, so they know to edit it

[okurz]

Yes, the admin reading this needs to patch up the script afterwards. If it would fail then wicked would likely ignore the failure anyway.