Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Improve User-feedback for VNC sockets is not existing #862

Closed

Conversation

Soulofdestiny
Copy link
Contributor

On ipmi and s390x sometimes jobs gets incomplete or fail without a module
This PR is meant to improve user feedback by showing a record_info box with a proper
error message

see related tickets:
https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/20022
https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/23650

On ipmi and s390x sometimes jobs gets incomplete or fail without a module
This PR is meant to improve user feedback by showing a record_info box with a proper
error message

see related tickets:
https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/20022
https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/23650
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.09%) to 54.677% when pulling 0de7137 on Soulofdestiny:s390_ipmi_sockets into 1233c04 on os-autoinst:master.

@@ -878,7 +880,11 @@ sub _receive_message {
my $self = shift;

my $socket = $self->socket;
$socket or die 'socket does not exist. Probably your backend instance could not start or died.';
#$socket or die 'socket does not exist. Probably your backend instance could not start or died.';
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be deleted then but I would like to keep the text in the exception error message. We should give that hint to the test writer that probably we should not have run into that step at all, i.e. test code need to be changed or the SUT does not respond. And not "there is no socket because something is wrong in the backend"

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's done below, so I'll create another PR based on this one with commented code removed,

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in #864

rwx788 pushed a commit to rwx788/os-autoinst that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2017
[PR#862](os-autoinst#862) review
comment fix.
@coolo
Copy link
Contributor

coolo commented Oct 12, 2017

superseded by 864

@coolo coolo closed this Oct 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants