You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If you're cycling or hiking etc, you often want to know how many hills there are before a given stop (say for example you're riding somewhere with a lunch stop as an intermediate destination - this is fairly essential information).
At the moment you can work it out by entering 'route details' and swiping down (or going into 'analyse on map') and scrubbing the graph back and forwards to find the right point, but this is awkward.
az_recorder_20240726_151724.mp4
It would be great if intermediate destinations were marked on all the elevation graphs. It wouldn't need to be obtrusive - just a tiny little 'pip' on the axis would be good enough I think (you wouldn't even need to number them I don't think).
Tell us about the expected behaviour (required)
Draw a small pip on the horizontal axis of all elevation graphs corresponding to the position along the route of intermediate destinations.
Possibly make it optional, but I doubt it'd bother anyone who isn't interested.
Tell us about alternatives you've considered (required)
The above scrubbing workaround is available, but it's needlessly awkward.
Context (optional)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the idea (required)
If you're cycling or hiking etc, you often want to know how many hills there are before a given stop (say for example you're riding somewhere with a lunch stop as an intermediate destination - this is fairly essential information).
At the moment you can work it out by entering 'route details' and swiping down (or going into 'analyse on map') and scrubbing the graph back and forwards to find the right point, but this is awkward.
az_recorder_20240726_151724.mp4
It would be great if intermediate destinations were marked on all the elevation graphs. It wouldn't need to be obtrusive - just a tiny little 'pip' on the axis would be good enough I think (you wouldn't even need to number them I don't think).
Tell us about the expected behaviour (required)
Draw a small pip on the horizontal axis of all elevation graphs corresponding to the position along the route of intermediate destinations.
Possibly make it optional, but I doubt it'd bother anyone who isn't interested.
Tell us about alternatives you've considered (required)
The above scrubbing workaround is available, but it's needlessly awkward.
Context (optional)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: