Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Routing engine #315

Closed
Ligverd opened this issue Sep 17, 2012 · 3 comments
Closed

Routing engine #315

Ligverd opened this issue Sep 17, 2012 · 3 comments

Comments

@Ligverd
Copy link

Ligverd commented Sep 17, 2012

Why not try OSRM (GNU) as the routing engine?

@sanderd17
Copy link
Contributor

OSRM can be used as online routing engine. If you mean using it as offline
engine, well that has some difficulties. OSRM doesn't use the same file
format, so you would have to install maps in two different formats, or
write an interface for it. Also, you would need to have an interface to get
the routes created by OSRM into OsmAnd.

If you want to write those things, I think nobody is stopping you.

Regards,
Sander

2012/9/17 Ligverd notifications@github.com

Why not try OSRM (GNU) as the routing engine?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/315.

@Ligverd
Copy link
Author

Ligverd commented Sep 17, 2012

Yes I meant offline routing.
Fork OSRM project and rewrite it to fit Osmand.
I will be very difficult to do, because have to deal in both engines.

Then the question is, how much potential engine OSRM quicker built in Osmand Offline?

I wonder to what is trying to port in OSRM Osmand?

@vshcherb
Copy link
Member

Actually Online Routing Engine are very very different from Offline (mobile) Routing Engines. I think we are using OSRM as online provider but we are not going to switch as offline provider for now. Probably it is worth to try but it is out of current priority list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants