Exp tracker

[ArturKnopik]

Exp tracker feature
config:
analyserSendTrueRawExp - default false, give ability to send raw exp without multiplication by expStage

analyserSendTrueRawExp false

analyserSendTrueRawExp true

[EPuncker]

add the config.lua.dist entry and we good

[ramon-bernardo]

You need to register in luascript.cpp, right?
registerEnumIn("configKeys", ConfigManager::EXP_ANALYSER_SEND_TRUE_RAW_EXP)

[EPuncker]

thank you

[ranisalt]

analyserSendTrueRawExp - default false, give ability to send raw exp without multiplication by expStage

Why would someone want one option over the other?

[ramon-bernardo]

analyserSendTrueRawExp - default false, give ability to send raw exp without multiplication by expStage

Why would someone want one option over the other?

Yes, looks like custom config for server, far from TibiaRL

[dudantas]

It would be interesting to cite the original author (@marcosvf132): opentibiabr/canary#232

[EPuncker]

It would be interesting to cite the original author (@marcosvf132): opentibiabr/canary#232

TRUE
opentibiabr/canary#249
https://github.com/opentibiabr/canary/pull/250/files#diff-2b16a5ca17f2799203c4df2fdf8c16dbeceb88bb4aaf60513f647e704fbf4ddeR1018

hehehe

[ranisalt]

It would be interesting to cite the original author (@marcosvf132): opentibiabr/canary#232

The code has nothing special and there is no requirement to mention the author in the license. Please stop begging for it every time 🙏 the author is free to open a pull request to this repository if they want.

[dudantas]

The code has nothing special and there is no requirement to mention the author in the license. Please stop begging for it every time 🙏 the author is free to open a pull request to this repository if they want.

It's free to open and I'm free to comment. Am I not?
It is a common practice in open source to cite the author of the code, it is not mandatory, but it is something that strengthens ties and passes an air of respect. Not that I'm expecting that, as I've realized that this sort of thing has long since been abandoned by this community, regrettably.

And you still wonder why some people don't contribute more here?

[nekiro]

The code has nothing special and there is no requirement to mention the author in the license. Please stop begging for it every time 🙏 the author is free to open a pull request to this repository if they want.

It's free to open and I'm free to comment. Am I not? It is a common practice in open source to cite the author of the code, it is not mandatory, but it is something that strengthens ties and passes an air of respect. Not that I'm expecting that, as I've realized that this sort of thing has long since been abandoned by this community, regrettably.

And you still wonder why some people don't contribute more here?

I still wonder why are you checking every single commit, every single pull request of this repository, if it's so bad and so dead

[joseluis2g]

4 line codes of course need authors, we need to add jo3 as author because he was the first who exposed this code so.
edit. might be slavidodo and not jo3