We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi!
This is a tiny detail, but it seems the preprint was updated and that equation 24 has changed.
ott/src/ott/solvers/linear/sinkhorn.py
Line 278 in e1bbd34
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.12958v2.pdf has the right equation though.
While I'm at it, in the Sinkhorn docs, https://ott-jax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/solvers/_autosummary/ott.solvers.linear.sinkhorn.Sinkhorn.html, shouldn't it be +g in eq 1, and +KL in eq 3?
Best
GJ
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks @gjhuizing for noticing this, closed via #548
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hi!
This is a tiny detail, but it seems the preprint was updated and that equation 24 has changed.
ott/src/ott/solvers/linear/sinkhorn.py
Line 278 in e1bbd34
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.12958v2.pdf has the right equation though.
While I'm at it, in the Sinkhorn docs, https://ott-jax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/solvers/_autosummary/ott.solvers.linear.sinkhorn.Sinkhorn.html, shouldn't it be +g in eq 1, and +KL in eq 3?
Best
GJ
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: