Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ValueCodingTransformerProviding that allows encoding/decoding without implmenting Codable #60

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 24, 2023

Conversation

kdubb
Copy link
Collaborator

@kdubb kdubb commented Sep 24, 2023

By extending existing non-codable types to be ValueCodingTranformerProviding they can be used with current (Keyed/Unkeyed/SingleValue)Codingcontainer just as Codable types are.

Note that this will not make the types Codable and therefore will still require manual implementation of Codable for any type using them.

…ithout implmenting `Codable`

By extending existing non-codable types to be `ValueCodingTranformerProviding` they can be used with current (`Keyed`/`Unkeyed`/`SingleValue`)`Codingcontainer` just as `Codable` types are.

Note that this will not make the types `Codable` and therefore will still require manual implementation of `Codable` for any type using them.
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 24, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 1 Code Smell

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@kdubb kdubb merged commit de4bc28 into main Sep 24, 2023
13 checks passed
@kdubb kdubb deleted the feature/transformable branch September 24, 2023 03:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant