Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing Centos 6 repositories for 9.X.X #23188

Closed
gmernov opened this issue Mar 12, 2016 · 11 comments
Closed

Missing Centos 6 repositories for 9.X.X #23188

gmernov opened this issue Mar 12, 2016 · 11 comments
Assignees

Comments

@gmernov
Copy link

gmernov commented Mar 12, 2016

Hi, as long as i see, there's no repository of the line 9.X.X for Centos 6.X. It would be nice be have such in: https://download.owncloud.org/download/repositories/stable/owncloud/

@LukasReschke
Copy link
Member

cc @jnweiger

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 12, 2016

This is the current list of platforms:

CenOS 7 (CentOS 6: Files only)

according to:

https://owncloud.org/blog/time-to-upgrade-to-owncloud-9-0/

so there should be at least a repo for CentOS 6 containing owncloud-files

@adrianvg
Copy link

So what does "CentOS 6: Files only" mean on the above link?
A manual install is required?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 18, 2016

That is referring to that note:

The owncloud-files package can be installed alone. It has only one packaging logic: obsolete and replace the 8.x owncloud packages. It requires no PHP, database, Apache webserver or other dependencies. An ownCloud server installed only from the owncloud-files package is not directly runnable, unless you made sure all dependencies are in place by hand.

@adrianvg
Copy link

Ok, thanks.
Let's hope the packager packs version 9 for us CentOS 6-users in a nearby future then. 8-)

@jnweiger
Copy link
Contributor

https://download.owncloud.org/download/repositories/stable/owncloud-files/ shows that the normal CentOS_6 repo has the owncloud-files package.

@jnweiger jnweiger self-assigned this Mar 18, 2016
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 18, 2016

@jnweiger Honestly, there is something really broken with the communication about such breaking changes (this isn't the first time). :-/

How should a user ever get to this link if this is not clearly communicated?

https://owncloud.org/install/#instructions-server -> Only links to https://download.owncloud.org/download/repositories/stable/owncloud/

https://owncloud.org/changelog -> Only linking to https://download.owncloud.org/download/repositories/9.0/owncloud/ and https://download.owncloud.org/download/repositories/stable/owncloud/

https://doc.owncloud.org/server/9.0/admin_manual/search.html?q=owncloud-files -> No note about "owncloud-files" there

https://owncloud.org/blog/time-to-upgrade-to-owncloud-9-0/ -> Is only talking about a "owncloud-files" package, no note about that extra page with different instructions.

Is there some one we could pull in here to clean-up that mess?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 18, 2016

Ok, that needs to be corrected:

https://doc.owncloud.org/server/9.0/admin_manual/search.html?q=owncloud-files -> No note about "owncloud-files" there

This is hidden deep into https://doc.owncloud.org/server/9.0/admin_manual/installation/linux_installation.html

@jnweiger
Copy link
Contributor

Both, owncloud and owncloud-files are in the same repo. We should advertise them togeter in one web-page.

Documenting two links makes it appear as if it were two repos. E.g. users could try to disable one, enable the other and be (again) confused about the result.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 18, 2016

Just as a follow-up from owncloud-archive/owncloud.org#910:

There is now only one repos "owncloud": https://download.owncloud.org/download/repositories/stable/owncloud/ containing both, "owncloud" and "owncloud-files" packages.

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Aug 5, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 5, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants