Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(linter) eslint plugin unicorn: prefer regex test #1187

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions crates/oxc_ast/src/ast/js.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -722,6 +722,12 @@ pub enum Argument<'a> {
Expression(Expression<'a>),
}

impl Argument<'_> {
pub fn is_spread(&self) -> bool {
matches!(self, Self::SpreadElement(_))
}
}

/// Update Expression
#[derive(Debug, Hash)]
#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", derive(Serialize), serde(tag = "type"))]
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions crates/oxc_linter/src/rules.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ mod unicorn {
pub mod prefer_date_now;
pub mod prefer_logical_operator_over_ternary;
pub mod prefer_query_selector;
pub mod prefer_regexp_test;
pub mod prefer_string_trim_start_end;
pub mod prefer_type_error;
pub mod require_number_to_fixed_digits_argument;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -301,6 +302,7 @@ oxc_macros::declare_all_lint_rules! {
unicorn::prefer_date_now,
unicorn::prefer_logical_operator_over_ternary,
unicorn::prefer_query_selector,
unicorn::prefer_regexp_test,
unicorn::prefer_string_trim_start_end,
unicorn::prefer_type_error,
unicorn::require_number_to_fixed_digits_argument,
Expand Down
234 changes: 234 additions & 0 deletions crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/unicorn/prefer_regexp_test.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
use oxc_ast::{
ast::{Argument, Expression, MemberExpression},
AstKind,
};
use oxc_diagnostics::{
miette::{self, Diagnostic},
thiserror::Error,
};
use oxc_macros::declare_oxc_lint;
use oxc_span::Span;

use crate::{ast_util::outermost_paren_parent, context::LintContext, rule::Rule, AstNode};

#[derive(Debug, Error, Diagnostic)]
#[error("eslint-plugin-unicorn(prefer-regexp-test): Prefer RegExp#test() over String#match() and RegExp#exec()")]
#[diagnostic(
severity(warning),
help("RegExp#test() exclusively returns a boolean and therefore is more efficient")
)]
struct PreferRegexpTestDiagnostic(#[label] pub Span);

#[derive(Debug, Default, Clone)]
pub struct PreferRegexpTest;

declare_oxc_lint!(
/// ### What it does
///
/// Prefers `RegExp#test()` over `String#match()` and `String#exec()`.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
///
/// When you want to know whether a pattern is found in a string, use [`RegExp#test()`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/RegExp/test) instead of [`String#match()`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/match) and [`RegExp#exec()`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/RegExp/exec), as it exclusively returns a boolean and therefore is more efficient.
///
///
/// ### Example
/// ```javascript
/// // Bad
/// if (string.match(/unicorn/)) { }
/// if (/unicorn/.exec(string)) {}
///
/// // Good
/// if (/unicorn/.test(string)) {}
/// Boolean(string.match(/unicorn/))
///
/// ```
PreferRegexpTest,
pedantic
);

impl Rule for PreferRegexpTest {
fn run<'a>(&self, node: &AstNode<'a>, ctx: &LintContext<'a>) {
let AstKind::CallExpression(call_expr) = node.kind() else { return };

let Some(member_expr) = call_expr.callee.get_member_expr() else { return };

if call_expr.optional || call_expr.arguments.len() != 1 {
return;
}

if call_expr.arguments[0].is_spread() {
return;
}

let (span, name) = match member_expr {
MemberExpression::StaticMemberExpression(v) => {
if !matches!(v.property.name.as_str(), "match" | "exec") {
return;
}
(v.property.span, &v.property.name)
}
_ => return,
};

let Some(parent) = outermost_paren_parent(node, ctx) else { return };

match parent.kind() {
AstKind::ForStatement(for_stmt) => {
let Some(test) = &for_stmt.test else { return };

let Expression::CallExpression(call_expr2) = test else {
return;
};

// Check if the `test` of the for statement is the same node as the call expression.
if call_expr2.0 as *const _ != call_expr as *const _ {
return;
}
}
AstKind::ConditionalExpression(conditional_expr) => {
let Expression::CallExpression(call_expr2) = &conditional_expr.test else {
return;
};

// Check if the `test` of the conditional expression is the same node as the call expression.
if call_expr2.0 as *const _ != call_expr as *const _ {
return;
}
}

AstKind::Argument(_) => {
let Some(parent) = outermost_paren_parent(parent, ctx) else { return };

let AstKind::CallExpression(call_expr) = parent.kind() else { return };

let Expression::Identifier(ident) = &call_expr.callee else {
return;
};

if ident.name.as_str() != "Boolean" {
return;
}
}
AstKind::WhileStatement(_)
| AstKind::DoWhileStatement(_)
| AstKind::IfStatement(_)
| AstKind::UnaryExpression(_) => {}
_ => return,
}

match name.as_str() {
"match" => {
if member_expr.object().is_literal()
&& !matches!(member_expr.object(), Expression::RegExpLiteral(_))
{
return;
}

if let Argument::Expression(expr) = &call_expr.arguments[0] {
if expr.is_literal() && !matches!(expr, Expression::RegExpLiteral(_)) {
return;
}
}
}
"exec" => {
if member_expr.object().is_literal()
&& !matches!(member_expr.object(), Expression::RegExpLiteral(_))
{
return;
}
}
_ => unreachable!("match or test {:?}", name),
}

ctx.diagnostic(PreferRegexpTestDiagnostic(span));
}
}

#[test]
fn test() {
use crate::tester::Tester;

let pass = vec![
r#"const bar = !re.test(foo)"#,
r#"const matches = foo.match(re) || []"#,
r#"const matches = foo.match(re)"#,
r#"const matches = re.exec(foo)"#,
r#"while (foo = re.exec(bar)) {}"#,
r#"while ((foo = re.exec(bar))) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.notMatch(re)) {}"#,
r#"if (re.notExec(foo)) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match) {}"#,
r#"if (re.exec) {}"#,
r#"if (foo[match](re)) {}"#,
r#"if (re[exec](foo)) {}"#,
r#"if (foo["match"](re)) {}"#,
r#"if (re["exec"](foo)) {}"#,
r#"if (match(re)) {}"#,
r#"if (exec(foo)) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match()) {}"#,
r#"if (re.exec()) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(re, another)) {}"#,
r#"if (re.exec(foo, another)) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(...[regexp])) {}"#,
r#"if (re.exec(...[string])) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(1)) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match("1")) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(null)) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(1n)) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(true)) {}"#,
];

let fail = vec![
r#"const re = /a/; const bar = !foo.match(re)"#,
r#"const re = /a/; const bar = Boolean(foo.match(re))"#,
r#"const re = /a/; if (foo.match(re)) {}"#,
r#"const re = /a/; const bar = foo.match(re) ? 1 : 2"#,
r#"const re = /a/; while (foo.match(re)) foo = foo.slice(1);"#,
r#"const re = /a/; do {foo = foo.slice(1)} while (foo.match(re));"#,
r#"const re = /a/; for (; foo.match(re); ) foo = foo.slice(1);"#,
r#"const re = /a/; const bar = !re.exec(foo)"#,
r#"const re = /a/; const bar = Boolean(re.exec(foo))"#,
r#"const re = /a/; if (re.exec(foo)) {}"#,
r#"const re = /a/; const bar = re.exec(foo) ? 1 : 2"#,
r#"const re = /a/; while (re.exec(foo)) foo = foo.slice(1);"#,
r#"const re = /a/; do {foo = foo.slice(1)} while (re.exec(foo));"#,
r#"const re = /a/; for (; re.exec(foo); ) foo = foo.slice(1);"#,
r#"const re = /a/; if ((0, foo).match(re)) {}"#,
r#"const re = /a/; if ((0, foo).match((re))) {}"#,
r#"const re = /a/; if ((foo).match(re)) {}"#,
r#"const re = /a/; if ((foo).match((re))) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(/re/)) {}"#,
r#"const re = /a/; if (foo.match(re)) {}"#,
r#"const bar = {bar: /a/}; if (foo.match(bar.baz)) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(bar.baz())) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(new RegExp(\"re\", \"g\"))) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(new SomeRegExp())) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(new SomeRegExp)) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(bar?.baz)) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(bar?.baz())) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(bar || baz)) {}"#,
r#"if ((foo).match(/re/)) {}"#,
r#"if ((foo).match(new SomeRegExp)) {}"#,
r#"if ((foo).match(bar?.baz)) {}"#,
r#"if ((foo).match(bar?.baz())) {}"#,
r#"const bar = false; const baz = /a/; if ((foo).match(bar || baz)) {}"#,
r#"const re = [/a/]; if (foo.match([re][0])) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(unknown)) {}"#,
r#"if (foo.match(/a/g));"#,
r#"if (foo.match(/a/y));"#,
r#"if (foo.match(/a/gy));"#,
r#"if (foo.match(/a/ig));"#,
r#"if (foo.match(new RegExp(\"a\", \"g\")));"#,
r#"if (/a/g.exec(foo));"#,
r#"if (/a/y.exec(foo));"#,
r#"if (/a/gy.exec(foo));"#,
r#"if (/a/yi.exec(foo));"#,
r#"if (new RegExp(\"a\", \"g\").exec(foo));"#,
r#"if (new RegExp(\"a\", \"y\").exec(foo));"#,
r#"!/a/u.exec(foo)"#,
r#"!/a/v.exec(foo)"#,
];

Tester::new_without_config(PreferRegexpTest::NAME, pass, fail).test_and_snapshot();
}
Loading
Loading