EXTI IRQ docs improvements #1699
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The comment in the `nucleo-user-button` demo task gets the order of arguments to `sys.gpio_irq_control` backwards. Since this example task is intended to demonstrate how to use this API, we should definitely fix this. Thanks @bcantrill for catching it!
hawkw
force-pushed
the
eliza/fix-gpio-irq-comment
branch
from
1e6697f
to
1d069b7
Compare
hawkw
changed the title
cbiffle
approved these changes
Apr 1, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This branch contains two commits, both related to documentation for EXTI GPIO IRQs:
nucleo-user-buttondemo taskstm32xx-syscrate