Issue #57 date regex #58
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 4 commits
September 2, 2018 18:05
added ability to regex test date format before parsing to date object added option to set lenient on simple date format
added ability to regex test date format before parsing to date object added option to set lenient on simple date format
Conflicts: src/main/java/com/poiji/bind/mapping/WorkBookContentHandler.java src/main/java/com/poiji/bind/mapping/XSSFUnmarshaller.java src/main/java/com/poiji/option/PoijiOptions.java
|
Thanks @Developer-Matt , merged! |
|
Thanks very much |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ability to specify a regex pattern to test against before parsing a date string to date object
if regex match fails return default date, if passes then parse date
Also option to specify lenient to set the lenient option on the simple date format.
Did fix potential bug on line 171 of Casting.java, please review this