Feature request: fix links

[Vinnl]

This looks good @ozum! I haven't tried it yet, but since it isn't listed I presume this isn't implemented yet: is it possible to fix relative links? For example, when one markdown file refers to another, or even to a heading in another, those could be changed to refer to the relevant heading in the concatenated file.

So e.g.

README.md

# Read me

Here's a cool reference to [more info](more-info.md#the-info).

more-info.md

# More info
Hi there, want more info?

## The info

Here's more info.

This could result in:

concatenated.md

# Read me

Here's a cool reference to [more info](#the-info).

# More info

Hi there, want more info?

## The info

Here's more info.

(And another request: perhaps the README of this project could also give a small example of two input files and the resulting concatenated file.)

Thanks for picking this up!

[ozum]

@Vinnl it is not implemented, but good idea, I will try to implement it.

About example. There is a very simple example at the end of README. In case you missed that, please have a look. If you still think that example is not clear, please let me know, so that I can improve it.

[Vinnl]

@ozum What can I say - I'm blind, apparently. I guess I was thrown off by the heading for README.md appearing to be larger than those for the individual files due to its capitalisation, but that's indeed exactly what I was looking for :)

[ozum]

@ozum What can I say - I'm blind, apparently.

No worries, happens to me lots of the time :)

@Vinnl, I released a new version (0.2.0), which converts relative links.

• If --file-name-as-title is used, links are converted to point to generated file title,
• Otherwise <a name="file-path-slug"></a> added to start position of each file and converted links point to this.
• # Hash tags are converted to point to generated file. (If two different links with same name exists, unfortunately first one wins. I have some ideas but they are not so easy to implement)

Feedbacks are welcome.