Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature request] Classification of most used items #46

Closed
iJaack opened this issue Sep 11, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

[Feature request] Classification of most used items #46

iJaack opened this issue Sep 11, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@iJaack
Copy link

iJaack commented Sep 11, 2019

I think it will be very useful to show the most used and copied items first, and then the others, instead of showing them just in chronological order.

@p0deje p0deje added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 12, 2019
@p0deje
Copy link
Owner

p0deje commented Oct 4, 2019

What would you consider "most used or copied"? Would it count:

  1. How often the item was copied?
  2. How often the item was selected inside Maccy?
  3. Both?

@p0deje p0deje added the needs triaging Further information is requested label Oct 4, 2019
@iJaack
Copy link
Author

iJaack commented Oct 27, 2019

I consider the items that are copied most often, I think It would be better.

@p0deje p0deje removed the needs triaging Further information is requested label Oct 28, 2019
@iJaack iJaack closed this as completed Dec 23, 2019
@p0deje
Copy link
Owner

p0deje commented Dec 23, 2019

Why have you close this?

@iJaack
Copy link
Author

iJaack commented Dec 26, 2019

sorry, I closed the wrong one ;)

@iJaack iJaack reopened this Dec 26, 2019
@p0deje
Copy link
Owner

p0deje commented Mar 15, 2020

Since 0.9.0 you can now use

defaults write org.p0deje.Maccy sortBy numberOfCopies

@p0deje p0deje closed this as completed Mar 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants