Friendly names for scalars in GraphQL schema

[cafca]

Removes Scalar suffix in gql schema.

Closes #229

📋 Checklist

• Add tests that cover your changes
• Add this PR to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
• Link this PR to any issues it closes
• New files contain a SPDX license header

[cafca]

@adzialocha the other odd one is EntryHash as we just call that Hash everywhere else. We could also rename it for consistency but on the other hand having a type just called "hash" might also be confusing. The type's description tells you what it is but still. What do you think?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #231 (469edf4) into development (9ddee8b) will increase coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is 93.65%.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           development     #231      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage        94.12%   94.24%   +0.12%     
===============================================
  Files               59       59              
  Lines             4834     4867      +33     
===============================================
+ Hits              4550     4587      +37     
+ Misses             284      280       -4     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...quadoggo/src/graphql/client/dynamic_types/tests.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
aquadoggo/src/graphql/client/static_query.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
aquadoggo/src/graphql/replication/client.rs	85.71% <ø> (ø)
aquadoggo/src/graphql/replication/query.rs	90.37% <ø> (ø)
aquadoggo/src/graphql/replication/response.rs	93.87% <ø> (ø)
...go/src/graphql/scalars/encoded_operation_scalar.rs	84.61% <50.00%> (-7.06%)	⬇️
aquadoggo/src/graphql/scalars/entry_hash_scalar.rs	83.33% <81.81%> (+1.51%)	⬆️
...adoggo/src/graphql/scalars/encoded_entry_scalar.rs	91.66% <91.66%> (ø)
aquadoggo/src/graphql/client/dynamic_query.rs	93.42% <100.00%> (ø)
aquadoggo/src/graphql/client/mutation.rs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 6 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[adzialocha]

@adzialocha the other odd one is EntryHash as we just call that Hash everywhere else. We could also rename it for consistency but on the other hand having a type just called "hash" might also be confusing. The type's description tells you what it is but still. What do you think?

I agree, let's stick to EntryHash. Its also the only "Hash" we provide right now via the API.