Perform "quick commit" in materializer service

[sandreae]

Uses p2panda/p2panda#485 to perform a quick commit on a document instead of materializing from scratch.

📋 Checklist

• Add tests that cover your changes
• Add this PR to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
• Link this PR to any issues it closes
• New files contain a SPDX license header

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 95.18% and project coverage change: +0.14 🎉

Comparison is base (8cd21bd) 92.46% compared to head (0cee8e2) 92.61%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #280      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.46%   92.61%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          70       70              
  Lines        6573     6652      +79     
==========================================
+ Hits         6078     6161      +83     
+ Misses        495      491       -4     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
aquadoggo/src/materializer/service.rs	95.27% <95.12%> (-0.14%)	⬇️
aquadoggo/src/db/stores/document.rs	91.63% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[sandreae]

This PR is still open, and I'm actually nervous to merge it, cos I think it will hide any concurrency bugs even deeper 😅

[adzialocha]

This PR is still open, and I'm actually nervous to merge it, cos I think it will hide any concurrency bugs even deeper 😅

Oooh interesting, did you observe new / more issues on that branch?

[sandreae]

This PR is still open, and I'm actually nervous to merge it, cos I think it will hide any concurrency bugs even deeper sweat_smile

Oooh interesting, did you observe new / more issues on that branch?

No new observations I'm afraid. Just the thought that by using "quick commits" to update documents without issuing reduce tasks, then we'd probably make reproducing any concurrency bugs even hard....

[adzialocha]

I think the errors I get are all happening before materialization (it's always about duplicate seq num, log id or some missing operation id hashes).

Let me run this branch a couple of times and see if I can tell a difference in the issues. Would be nice to merge this!

[adzialocha]

I think the errors I get are all happening before materialization (it's always about duplicate seq num, log id or some missing operation id hashes).

Let me run this branch a couple of times and see if I can tell a difference in the issues. Would be nice to merge this!

Same bugs as in #270, so all good 😆

[sandreae]

I think the errors I get are all happening before materialization (it's always about duplicate seq num, log id or some missing operation id hashes).
Let me run this branch a couple of times and see if I can tell a difference in the issues. Would be nice to merge this!

Same bugs as in #270, so all good laughing

Well, that's good..... lolz...

[sandreae]

I'll get this ready for merging when I have time then 👍