Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Job images can only be pulled from the Docker Registry #24

Closed
JoeyZwicker opened this issue Jan 13, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Job images can only be pulled from the Docker Registry #24

JoeyZwicker opened this issue Jan 13, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@JoeyZwicker
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@versae
Copy link

versae commented Feb 11, 2015

One question I have, is it working with privately-run Docker registries. If so, why not having Pachyderm to run their own registry at least in one node? I see a registry.service in the 1Node, but not sure how to use it.

Also, that raises more questions, like should the registry work in high availability mode in the cluster? If not, maybe a Paxos-based approach might work. Or maybe by pulling the docker files from git could remove the need for the docker registry?

Sorry if what I'am saying is nonsense, the project just looks really amazing and I got excited :)

@JoeyZwicker
Copy link
Member Author

@versae We're thrilled that it excites you so much. Us too! :)

We're about to push out pfs v0.4 in the next few hours and I think you'll really like it. It includes support for privately-run docker registries inside the cluster and it's in high-availability mode by default.

We also will be rolling out a pretty in-depth integration with git that includes pulling docker files and bunch more cool stuff.

@versae
Copy link

versae commented Feb 11, 2015

Just can't express my feelings with words

@jdoliner
Copy link
Member

This has been fixed for a while. You can pull containers from any registry you'd like.

We had to temporarily unsupport the registry in the cluster due to some annoyances with certificates.
We'll be trying to get that reenabled soon!

chainlink pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2022
* Increment version for 0.1.0-alpha release

* Update CHANGELOG.md for 0.1.0-alpha release
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants