Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleaning up stale branches #449

Open
1 of 2 tasks
JP-Ellis opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
1 of 2 tasks

Cleaning up stale branches #449

JP-Ellis opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
type:question Further information is requested

Comments

@JP-Ellis
Copy link
Contributor

JP-Ellis commented Nov 3, 2023

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?

Description

I would like to clean up the old branches in this repository. Specifically, I am considering pruning the following branches:

Branch Updated Un-merged commits
travis-stages 6 years ago 9
setup-releases 6 years ago 18
stateless-contracts 6 years ago 1
always-run-e2e 6 years ago 1
docs/verifier_docs_examples 3 years ago 6
feat/V31 2 years ago 12
docs/kafka_example 2 years ago 3
feat/ffi-consumer1 2 years ago 2
snyk-fix-e0893507f8bdf5341d8ffe2cfae4bd0f 2 years ago 1
feat/ffi-provider1 2 years ago 8
pact_publish_instructions last year 1
repro/issue-310 last year 1

1Will be kept until v3 is released.

I will leave this issue open for a month to gather feedback before I do anything drastic.

Has this been requested on Canny?

No response

Motivation

Some of these branches have not been touched in years and therefore are unlikely to provide much value anymore. Especially with the overhaul required to v3 and the switch to the Pact Rust core, many changes will be either redundant or very difficult to apply in the new codebase.

Have you tried building it?

No response

Self-service

  • I'd be willing to contribute this feature to Pact Python myself.
@JP-Ellis JP-Ellis added the type:question Further information is requested label Nov 3, 2023
@JP-Ellis JP-Ellis self-assigned this Nov 3, 2023
@JP-Ellis
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have recently gone over all the stale branches above, and prefixed them which archived/. The idea is to break the workflow of anyone still using them. If no one notices that the branch has been renamed, then it should be safe to delete them.

I will give another few months before deleted the archived branches.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:question Further information is requested
Projects
Status: 📝 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant