Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Traceability of computed contracts #146

Open
iincer opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Traceability of computed contracts #146

iincer opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request user experience

Comments

@iincer
Copy link
Collaborator

iincer commented Feb 14, 2023 •
edited
Loading

It immediately comes to mind that we could extend Term with an identifier. When Pacti computes a term using others, it could in principle keep track of what terms were used to derive a system-level spec or a quotient. This could add a great deal of traceability to computed specifications.

Originally posted by @iincer in #145 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request user experience
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@iincer