Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Excavator: Upgrades Baseline to the latest version #879

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 25, 2019

Conversation

svc-excavator-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@svc-excavator-bot svc-excavator-bot commented Sep 23, 2019

excavator is a bot for automating changes across repositories.

Changes produced by the roomba/latest-baseline-oss check.

Release Notes

2.10.0

Type Description Link
Improvement A new checkJUnitDependencies task detects misconfigured JUnit dependencies which could result in some tests silently not running. #837
Improvement Some AssertJ assertions can now be automatically replaced with more idiomatic ones using refaster. #851
Fix PreferAssertj check avoids ambiguity in assertThat invocations #874
Improvement Improve performannce of error prone PreferAssertj check #875
Improvement StringBuilderConstantParameters suggested fix doesn't remove comments #877

2.10.1

Type Description Link
Fix Allow junit4 dependencies to exist without junit4 tests #880

2.11.0

Type Description Link
Improvement PreferAssertj supports migration of zero-delta floating point array asserts #883

2.11.1

Type Description Link
Fix checkJunitDependencies only checks Java source #885

2.11.2

Type Description Link
Fix AssertJ Refaster fixes use static assertThat imports #887

2.12.0

Type Description Link
Improvement Disable UnusedVariable error prone rule by default #888

To enable or disable this check, please contact the maintainers of Excavator.

@ferozco
Copy link
Contributor

ferozco commented Sep 25, 2019

👍

@bulldozer-bot bulldozer-bot bot merged commit 1b0b8f2 into develop Sep 25, 2019
@bulldozer-bot bulldozer-bot bot deleted the roomba/latest-baseline-oss branch September 25, 2019 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants