Remove dependency on ramda

[jethrolarson]

I know you're cherry picking the curry function but ramda is a bit big for just the one function.

[paldepind]

Yes. You are right. But it is a fine curry function 😓

[jethrolarson]

Please

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, 12:15 PM Texas Toland notifications@github.com
wrote:

Haha I'd be willing to rewrite it if you want.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#37 (comment)

[paldepind]

Ok 😄 We could copy and paste the curry function into union-type.

[texastoland]

I took a look and it'd be better to implement the subset of functionality you're using.

[wavebeem]

I would highly approve of this. Also, it would be really nice to provide the Ramda.T function on this lib. It could be called Type.Any, which would read really well imo.

var List = Type({
  Nil: {},
  Cons: {
    head: Type.Any,
    tail: undefined
  }
});

Maybe even a Type.Self alias which is just undefined for recursive types.