Stop recommending Tornado as a WSGI server #1187
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Tornado's WSGI server is less scalable than the alternatives and only really makes sense when you have a specific need to run both WSGI apps and Tornado-native apps in the same process. This recommendation has been an ongoing source of confusion, e.g. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26015116/making-tornado-to-serve-a-request-on-a-separate-thread. Fixes pallets#986.
|
LGTM. Sorry it has taken so long. |
untitaker
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2014
Stop recommending Tornado as a WSGI server
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tornado's WSGI server is less scalable than the alternatives and only really makes sense when you have a specific need to run both WSGI apps and Tornado-native apps in the same process. This recommendation has been an ongoing source of confusion, e.g. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26015116/making-tornado-to-serve-a-request-on-a-separate-thread.
Fixes #986.