You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is strange. I have just downloaded your gist - and I get a completely different output from the verifier:
pandaPIparser is configured as follows
Colors in output: true
Mode: plan verification
Verbosity: 0
Lenient mode: false
Ignore given order: false
Checking the given plan ...
IDs of subtasks used in the plan exist: true
Task with id=2 and task name "have_image" is not declared in the domain.
Task with id=5 and task name "take-image_t" is not declared in the domain.
Task with id=12 and task name "take_image_a" is not declared in the domain.
Task with id=13 and task name "have_image" is not declared in the domain.
Task with id=16 and task name "take-image_t" is not declared in the domain.
Task with id=20 and task name "take_image_a" is not declared in the domain.
Task with id=21 and task name "have_image" is not declared in the domain.
Task with id=24 and task name "take-image_t" is not declared in the domain.
Task with id=28 and task name "take_image_a" is not declared in the domain.
Tasks declared in plan actually exist and can be instantiated as given: false
Methods don't contain duplicate subtasks: true
Methods don't contain orphaned tasks: true
Plan verification result: false
The not declared in the domain issues arise from a difference in spelling. In the plan they are written as have_image, but the domain declares them as have-image.
Running the verifier, I got this in the output:
But there is not task with id=0 in the input plan.
See this gist for all of the inputs.
Note that validation should fail here, it's just that this error message doesn't seem to make sense.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: