TST: fix tests catching unorderable errors for python 3.6 #15007
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
See also MacPython/pandas-wheels#8, seems that the order of int and str is switched in some cases. Therefore making the test here more robust.
jorisvandenbossche
added
Python 3.6
Testing
|
@jreback not sure if this should be changes in |
|
yeah py 3.6. changed the error message, so maybe should change |
Current coverage is 84.78% (diff: 100%)@@ master #15007 diff @@
==========================================
Files 145 145
Lines 51090 51090
Methods 0 0
Messages 0 0
Branches 0 0
==========================================
+ Hits 43315 43316 +1
+ Misses 7775 7774 -1
Partials 0 0
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See also MacPython/pandas-wheels#8, seems that the order of int and str is switched in some cases (eg https://travis-ci.org/MacPython/pandas-wheels/jobs/187223139). Therefore making the test here more robust.
Related to #14684