Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG: hash random. in 3.3 exposed reliance on dict traversal order. #2331 #2358

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Nov 25, 2012

fixes all failing tests mentioned in #2331, perhaps others lurking.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 26, 2012

still failing.

@wesm
Copy link
Member

wesm commented Nov 26, 2012

Seems to be passing now. Still the python3 numpy issue though

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 26, 2012

The fix in groupby.aggregate is incorrect. The test passes, but the problem is still there.
I'm trying out a fix with OrderedDict, (2.7+, will need a shim)

Thanks for the badge btw. :)

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 27, 2012

Should be good now. There are still two failing tests on 3.3, that don't look like
a result of hash randomization, so #2331 is still not resolved.

FAIL: test_quoting (pandas.io.tests.test_parsers.TestPythonParser)
FAIL: test_cant_compare_tz_naive_w_aware (pandas.tseries.tests.test_timeseries.TestTimestamp

@wesm
Copy link
Member

wesm commented Nov 27, 2012

Thanks. I'll take the PR and address the failing tests separately

@wesm wesm closed this Nov 27, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant