BUG/DEPR: loc.__setitem__ incorrectly accepting positional slices #31840
Conversation
…sitional_slice
* REF: Move Loc-only methods to Loc * rebase fixup * merge fixup
|
Since this has been such a long time behavior (also used in our own tests ..), I think we should maybe consider raising a warning first. |
Yah, i'm leaning towards a deprecation cycle, too. |
jbrockmendel
added
Bug
Indexing
|
can you rebase, and agree with @jorisvandenbossche this is worth deprecating (even though its an incorrect behavior) |
|
updated per comments, but i think the "Do X instead" part isnt quite right. "Use iloc instead" works for Series, but doesnt work as well for DataFrame |
|
lgtm. can you add to the deprcations issue & rebase; ping on green. |
|
added to the deprecation tracker, rebased, and green (though the CI is broken for unrelated reasons) However I would still like to get a better message for users suggesting an alternative to use for the DataFrame case. cc @jorisvandenbossche for suggestions? |
|
@WillAyd suggestions for a more helpful message for the 2D case? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The 2D case is something like this?
df.iloc[:4, ['A', 'B'] = 1I'd say something like "use .loc with labels, or .iloc with positions instead." I don't think we can really say which will be easier for the user in the error message, so just don't take a position.
+1 on that. Trying to explain both options more in detail will get a bit complex for the deprecation warning I think |
Co-Authored-By: Tom Augspurger <TomAugspurger@users.noreply.github.com>
Makes sense, updated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm. unless @jorisvandenbossche or @TomAugspurger have other comments, merge away
pandas/tests/indexing/test_loc.py
Outdated
| with pytest.raises(TypeError, match=msg): | ||
| df.loc[1:3, 1] | ||
|
|
||
| with tm.assert_produces_warning(FutureWarning, check_stacklevel=False): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would optimise the stacklevel so it works correctly for dataframe, instead of series.
I would think doing this with dataframe will be more common (it's also the case that is more difficult to solve). At least in our tests it was mainly with dataframes
jorisvandenbossche
changed the title
|
thanks @jbrockmendel |
black pandasgit diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diffI plan to flesh out the tests before this goes in.
cc @toobaz