Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ENH: Deprecate non-keyword arguments for Resampler.interpolate #41699

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions doc/source/whatsnew/v1.3.0.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -683,6 +683,7 @@ Deprecations
- Deprecated passing arguments as positional (except for ``"codes"``) in :meth:`MultiIndex.codes` (:issue:`41485`)
- Deprecated passing arguments as positional in :meth:`Index.set_names` and :meth:`MultiIndex.set_names` (except for ``names``) (:issue:`41485`)
- Deprecated passing arguments (apart from ``cond`` and ``other``) as positional in :meth:`DataFrame.mask` and :meth:`Series.mask` (:issue:`41485`)
- Deprecated passing arguments as positional in :meth:`Resampler.interpolate` (other than ``"method"``) (:issue:`41485`)
- Deprecated passing arguments as positional in :meth:`DataFrame.clip` and :meth:`Series.clip` (other than ``"upper"`` and ``"lower"``) (:issue:`41485`)
- Deprecated special treatment of lists with first element a Categorical in the :class:`DataFrame` constructor; pass as ``pd.DataFrame({col: categorical, ...})`` instead (:issue:`38845`)
- Deprecated passing arguments as positional (except for ``"method"``) in :meth:`DataFrame.interpolate` and :meth:`Series.interpolate` (:issue:`41485`)
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions pandas/core/resample.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
from pandas.util._decorators import (
Appender,
Substitution,
deprecate_nonkeyword_arguments,
doc,
)

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -832,6 +833,7 @@ def fillna(self, method, limit=None):
"""
return self._upsample(method, limit=limit)

@deprecate_nonkeyword_arguments(version=None, allowed_args=["self", "method"])
@doc(NDFrame.interpolate, **_shared_docs_kwargs)
def interpolate(
self,
Expand Down
27 changes: 27 additions & 0 deletions pandas/tests/resample/test_deprecated.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -278,3 +278,30 @@ def test_resample_base_with_timedeltaindex():

tm.assert_index_equal(without_base.index, exp_without_base)
tm.assert_index_equal(with_base.index, exp_with_base)


def test_interpolate_posargs_deprecation():
MarcoGorelli marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
# GH 41485
df = DataFrame({"ds": ["1992-08-27 07:46:48", "1992-08-27 07:46:59"], "y": [1, 4]})
s = Series(
df.iloc[:, 1].values.reshape(-1), index=pd.to_datetime(df.iloc[:, 0].values)
)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a simpler way to create s?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is needed to give this logic for s, otherwise it is taking the indexes making it not operable

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you do something like

idx = pd.to_datetime(["1992-08-27 07:46:48", "1992-08-27 07:46:59"])
df = DataFrame({'y': [1, 4]}, index=idx)
ser = Series([1, 4], index=idx)


result = s.resample("3s").interpolate("linear")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Once you've got the warning message, you need to put the

with tm.assert_produces_warning

back

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But with that it is not able to pass the testcase

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

then you need to fix the code so it passes the testcase 😄


df = DataFrame(
{
"ds": [
"1992-08-27 07:46:48",
"1992-08-27 07:46:51",
"1992-08-27 07:46:54",
"1992-08-27 07:46:57",
],
"y": [1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0],
}
)
expected = Series(
df.iloc[:, 1].values.reshape(-1), index=pd.to_datetime(df.iloc[:, 0].values)
)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

construct expected explicitly, don't put logic in tests

expected.index.freq = "3s"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jbrockmendel in other tests I've seen you do

    expected.index._data.freq = "3s"
  • is that preferrable here, or is this OK?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the ._data.freq = is preferable

MarcoGorelli marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
tm.assert_series_equal(result, expected)