POC/ENH: Timedelta min/max/resolution support non-nano

[jbrockmendel]

No description provided.

[mroeschke]

Thanks @jbrockmendel

[mroeschke]

I dont this this is directly related, but I think this hypothesis failure may be a near neighbor failure to the non-nano code you've been in the weeds with

022-07-08T19:09:27.0107944Z ================================== FAILURES ===================================
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0108768Z _______________ TestTimestampUnaryOps.test_round_sanity[round] ________________
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0188497Z [gw0] win32 -- Python 3.8.13 C:\Users\runneradmin\micromamba\envs\test\python.exe
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0188803Z 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0192971Z >   return Timedelta._from_value_and_reso(res_value, self._reso)
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0193292Z 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0193473Z pandas\_libs\tslibs\timestamps.pyx:521: 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0193820Z _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0194006Z 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0194394Z >   def _from_value_and_reso(cls, int64_t value, NPY_DATETIMEUNIT reso):
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0198386Z E   OverflowError: int too big to convert
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0198647Z 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0198846Z pandas\_libs\tslibs\timedeltas.pyx:1521: OverflowError
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0199075Z 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0199272Z The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0199508Z 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0199966Z self = <pandas.tests.scalar.timestamp.test_unary_ops.TestTimestampUnaryOps object at 0x000001C0E0CFFFA0>
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0204415Z method = <cyfunction Timestamp.round at 0x000001C0AE3BA520>
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0204681Z 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0205195Z     @given(val=st.integers(iNaT + 1, lib.i8max))
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0205516Z >   @pytest.mark.parametrize(
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0206044Z         "method", [Timestamp.round, Timestamp.floor, Timestamp.ceil]
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0210300Z     )
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0210514Z 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0210884Z pandas\tests\scalar\timestamp\test_unary_ops.py:301: 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0211247Z _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0211998Z pandas\tests\scalar\timestamp\test_unary_ops.py:351: in test_round_sanity
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0216046Z     assert np.abs((res - ts).value) < nanos
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0216452Z _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0216633Z 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0216772Z >   raise OutOfBoundsDatetime(
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0221599Z E   pandas._libs.tslibs.np_datetime.OutOfBoundsDatetime: Result is too large for pandas.Timedelta. Convert inputs to datetime.datetime with 'Timestamp.to_pydatetime()' before subtracting.
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0222080Z 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0227140Z pandas\_libs\tslibs\timestamps.pyx:525: OutOfBoundsDatetime
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0227891Z --------------------------------- Hypothesis ----------------------------------
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0228323Z Falsifying example: test_round_sanity(
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0228807Z     val=9223329600000000000,
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0229343Z     self=<pandas.tests.scalar.timestamp.test_unary_ops.TestTimestampUnaryOps at 0x1c0e0cfffa0>,
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0233440Z     method=<cyfunction Timestamp.round at 0x000001C0AE3BA520>,
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0233738Z )
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0233865Z 
2022-07-08T19:09:27.0238472Z You can reproduce this example by temporarily adding @reproduce_failure('6.47.1', b'AAAAf//ZZ2ZYgAA=') as a decorator on your test case