Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dask to 2022.9.2 #388

Closed
dhruvbalwada opened this issue Oct 12, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Update dask to 2022.9.2 #388

dhruvbalwada opened this issue Oct 12, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@dhruvbalwada
Copy link
Member

dhruvbalwada commented Oct 12, 2022

How would we go about updating dask to the 2022.9.2 version?

This version is supposed to fix a major problem that many run into with using dask: dask/distributed#7128 (reply in thread).

Do @jbusecke or @TomNicholas know how to do the update?

@jrbourbeau
Copy link
Member

I believe there are bots that automatically handle updating packages. #385 (opened 4 days ago) updates, among other things, dask + distributed to 2022.9.2. @scottyhq does CI passing on that PR mean the package updates are okay, or is there further testing that's usually done?

@jbusecke
Copy link
Collaborator

jbusecke commented Oct 13, 2022

Big +1 from me. I would love to check out the 'worker-saturation' feature on the hubs too! But I am afraid I do not know how to actually deploy that on the hubs. Pinging @yuvipanda as well here.

@yuvipanda
Copy link
Member

@jbusecke 2i2c-org/infrastructure#1769 is the equivalent on the hubs.

@scottyhq
Copy link
Member

does CI passing on that PR mean the package updates are okay, or is there further testing that's usually done?

Yes. no further testing is done currently. But I do usually look over the PR diff to make sure there are no major package version drops and look at the actions log to make sure the image size doesn't change significantly. It would be awesome to add some automated checks for those things! and @yuvipanda i wonder if it's now a good time to revive the idea of automated testing of new images on the hub itself with a bot user (I know there has been discussion of this in the past)...

@scottyhq
Copy link
Member

closed by #385

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants