Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about performance on official test Leaderboard #50

Closed
Eaphan opened this issue Nov 20, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Question about performance on official test Leaderboard #50

Eaphan opened this issue Nov 20, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@Eaphan
Copy link

Eaphan commented Nov 20, 2021

Thanks for your sharing.
I noticed that the CLOCs achieves much better performance on the official leaderboard than the number claimed in the paper. Can you please tell me how do you optimize the method or is there some bug?
http://www.cvlibs.net/datasets/kitti/eval_object.php?obj_benchmark=3d
@pangsu0613

@pangsu0613
Copy link
Owner

Hello @Viczyf, CLOCs can work with any pre-trained 3D and 2D detectors, so theoratically, if you have a better 3D/2D detector, you will have better performance. The new results of CLOCs on the kitti leaderboard is achieved by fusing the CT3D and cascade-RCNN, also with couple of small modifications, we will update the repo to include more better 3D detectors.

@Eaphan
Copy link
Author

Eaphan commented Nov 23, 2021

Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants