More explicit license statement?

[brodybits]

Thanks for the nice framework, I found it through the following Tweet: https://twitter.com/speckyboy/status/925407518565851136

In <package.json> the license is set to ISC which I really like (extremely simple and permissive). Is this your intention and can you make it more explicit?

[rhyneav]

Hey, I really appreciate that, thank you!

I'm glad you brought up licensing. It was something I ran through very quickly, but you are right; it needs to be more explicit.

[joeljuca]

Indeed!

I just opened a PR that adds a license file and updates the package.json to include @rhyneav's full name. 😁